But they can do so for deep learning and mathematics? Because in those fields, as I said, pre-publication peer review is not as common. Of course we need peer-

But they can do so for deep learning and mathematics? Because in those fields, as I said, pre-publication peer review is not as common. Of course we need peer-review and neither me nor the paper in the OP say otherwise. We just can't be gate-keeping research because of the review process; the review process needs to be re-thought and that includes the when and why.