3 ms·
It's obviously meaningless, at least in the US. A private contract between two individuals in the US cannot abrogate the ability of a court to compel someone to
by sidewndr46 4y ago
It's obviously meaningless, at least in the US. A private contract between two individuals in the US cannot abrogate the ability of a court to compel someone to testify in a criminal trial. When someone is put on the stand under oath, they're going to testify.
If the wording was something like "won't call the cops if you're way too fucking high" I'd find it more believable.
- braingenious 4y ago>If the wording was something like "won't call the cops if you're way too fucking high" I'd find it more believable. That’s exactly what they mean, and that is painfully obvious. I do not understand your point here. What exactly are you having difficulty believing? Do you think they intend to advertise that they provide blanket cover for every crime on earth? I am having difficulty believing that anyone would actually believe that that is what’s intended by that statement. It is much more believable that a person would intentionally misinterpret that statement to make some sort of vague joke about language.