>Given the context of the DOJ article, its just espionage tennis: a constant back and forth. Although I agree with your view, but the same applies in a signifi

>Given the context of the DOJ article, its just espionage tennis: a constant back and forth. Although I agree with your view, but the same applies in a significant amount of cases when US claims Chinese stole IPs. Also from my personal experience, a lot of collateral damage will be caused to innocents in this tennis game.