3 ms·
If you read it carefully, it's very clear that the poster is talking about multiple customers, not just one. A dozen or more companies (poster claims it's exac
by simonebrunozzi 4y ago
If you read it carefully, it's very clear that the poster is talking about multiple customers, not just one.
A dozen or more companies (poster claims it's exactly 14) can move 100k-500k VMs in a short time frame, without killing anything.
Otherwise, your concern would have been spot on.
- mroche 4y agoI didn't see the 14 on my first read through last night (I read this at like 1:30 in the morning), but that would make much more sense. I interpreted the "some" as a handful at most, which is why I said "footprints" and not "footprint". Even in that situation, I would probably still recommend not going the OpenShift Virtualization route. Obviously these groups would have different deployment sizes, but I would still personally be wary of moving several thousand VMs to OpenShift as part of a cost saving measure if there wasn't an intent to migrate to containers over time (based on the OpenShift Virtualization of today). That's not to say it's not possible or a bad idea, just that each org would need to evaluate for themselves. We do have customers that have made this just and are running OpenShift clusters with >1k VMs on OpenShift Virtualization.