> Instead, in CS, there is a tendency to hide behind an abrasive negative review when the reality is that the reviewer does not understand the paper. Never hea

> Instead, in CS, there is a tendency to hide behind an abrasive negative review when the reality is that the reviewer does not understand the paper. Never heard this argument, but having been under many double blind peer reviews in the last 10 years, I can sign this. Interestingly, in my last paper for PLOS One, one of two reviewers chose to lift anonymity and specifically his comments were on-focus, supportive and substantial.