3 ms·
Based on what, your feelings? This is one of the most accurate authentic comments here.
by encryptluks2 4y ago
Based on what, your feelings? This is one of the most accurate authentic comments here.
- aaaaaaaaata 4y agoMy feelings are: 1) this being common practice doesn't make it right 2) knowing someone's background, and deeply studying their historical writings, can provide a lot of color when evaluating someone's ethics, or any bias in their actions.
- sangnoir 4y ago> 1) this being common practice doesn't make it right But that just makes Twitter normal - that doesn't deserve congressional hearings, or whistleblowing IMO. Doctor's only briefly talk to patients before moving on, and depend a lot on the file: I don't think that is right - but that's what the American standard of care seems to have settled on. If I were to sue a doctor for malpractice, alleging they'd have made a more accurate diagnosis by spending more time with me, a valid defense for them would be to show that they followed standard practice. > 2) knowing someone's background, and deeply studying their historical writings, can provide a lot of color when evaluating someone's ethics, or any bias in their actions. I learned from the New Yorker article that Mudge signed an 7- or 8-million dollar agreement with Twitter earlier this year that had a carve-out in its non-disparagement clause(s) for whistleblowing That definitely "adds color"