5 ms·
This vastly underestimates the esoteric nature, experiential knowledge and complexity required to review most research published in the scientific community. Th
by hackernewds 4y ago
This vastly underestimates the esoteric nature, experiential knowledge and complexity required to review most research published in the scientific community. The common public cannot be expected to provide non-populist capable review of pharmaceutical level research
- jerojero 4y agoBut they can do so for deep learning and mathematics? Because in those fields, as I said, pre-publication peer review is not as common. Of course we need peer-review and neither me nor the paper in the OP say otherwise. We just can't be gate-keeping research because of the review process; the review process needs to be re-thought and that includes the when and why.