3 ms·
I am pretty sure that the payment processors giving you the choice of banning horny stuff or getting the boot would not look kindly upon “a separate branch with
by egypturnash 4y ago
I am pretty sure that the payment processors giving you the choice of banning horny stuff or getting the boot would not look kindly upon “a separate branch with different branding”.
OnlyFans could exist, sure, but like every other horny service ever it had a built-in time limit. When Visa/MC/Apple/etc notice how much porn money you’re doing, then the axe falls. Maybe you continue without the porn. Maybe you fold up. Either way all the pornmongers leave and look for a new way to get paid. In a few years they will be doing this again.
Patreon could have built OF, in theory, but this would require them to have more than the vaguest interest in actually building anything new. I’ve been using Patreon to get paid for my art since a few months after they launched and this is not a thing they have. I’m not sure they even actually have anyone who can do backend development any more. Mostly they just fuck up the front end every few years.
- remram 4y agoI don't mean that they have to do it with the same payment processor... different branding AND processor, sorry, I thought that was clear. As to why, Patreon was ALSO the organization most apt to sniff the size of that market. Those were their current customers! If OnlyFans managed to glimpse to potential revenue and build their platform, Patreon would have been aware. They had the platform, they had a known brand, they had relations with some of the clients, they knew how many people they were kicking out. This was such a huge advantage over anybody else.