3 ms·
She got very huffy and flat out denied that the blood bank dna was used to identify the murderer. He wans't covicted using that DNA, true, but the identificatio
by progre 4y ago
She got very huffy and flat out denied that the blood bank dna was used to identify the murderer. He wans't covicted using that DNA, true, but the identification was no secret.
The police had made 2 arrests of persons they later had to release at that point, so I guess they didn't like to take any chanses with the third.
It should be said that the general opinion outside of medical reserarch was supportive of the police.
- sidewndr46 4y agoThat's interesting, almost like the nurse was personally invested in this somehow. Not financially, but maybe morally?
- progre 4y agoI guess she had some integrety and loyalty to her proffesion. She like everyone else had been told that this was a registry for research and screening, and absolutely not the first step in some police state wet fantasy. She hated that they had made her into a liar. The registry is an enourmously valuble asset for the medical community but parents have to consent to the blood sample, so the police getting access was problematic to say the least.