7 ms·
Peer review is useful, no doubt. It is only reviewer anonymity that probably should be re-examined.
by sn41 4y ago
Peer review is useful, no doubt. It is only reviewer anonymity that probably should be re-examined.
- bumby 4y agoThere would probably be a need for a mechanism to ensure objectivity. E.g., if Reviewer A rejects Reviewer B, there may be a higher chance Reviewer B will reject Review A's future work, just out of spite.