> But the strong guarantees of rust are just so compelling. Rust's safety comes at a cost. I think its not for the greater good to pretend to ignore such, and

> But the strong guarantees of rust are just so compelling. Rust's safety comes at a cost. I think its not for the greater good to pretend to ignore such, and fall too deeply into hype, that can be partially generated by the companies behind it. With all things, there are positives and negatives. If you are into RAD or programs that you are creating are not mission-critical like that, then a person might want to avoid things like: longer compile times, low readability, difficult syntax, longer development times, etc... There is plenty of room for newer languages like Odin, Go, Vlang, etc... Where the focus has a wider scope for more convenient general-purpose programming.