3 ms·
Of course she's deranged, she's stabbing people, but the point is that you still want her to report the rapist-- imagine that you were her neighbour, you'd want
by impossiblefork 4y ago
Of course she's deranged, she's stabbing people, but the point is that you still want her to report the rapist-- imagine that you were her neighbour, you'd want her to report burglary attempts, surely? Similarly with rape.
Whether she is reliable only matters for the investigation of the crime.
I don't see it as a matter of a privacy violation. I see it as a socially contra-productive act, a kind of perfidy-- like pretending to surrender and then attacking somebody in war or pretending to be a medic in order to attack somebody.
- tinalumfoil 4y agoHonestly, the perfidy claims just really throws me for a loop. I genuinely don't understand how the police using evidence you willingly provide them to charge you is perfidy. > like pretending to surrender and then attacking somebody in war or pretending to be a medic in order to attack somebody There's international courts with the lofty goal of prosecuting "war crimes" and if you submit evidence that some country or group is committing war crimes, like killing medics, you don't get some special protection from the evidence you submit. If you submit a video where you and your opponent are both killing medics, everyone involved can be tried for war crimes. If you submit a video where you're killing A's medics and B is killing your medics, everyone involved can be prosecuted. In the US if the prosecution, has evidence that's both inculpatory and exculpatory they don't get to just tell the jury to ignore the exculpatory elements. I don't see how any court could be fair if this was not the case.