4 ms·
Considering that the article was written by a General, and posted on USNI, I'm inclined to believe the title is intentionally antagonistic. If the title was mor
by colejohnson66 4y ago
Considering that the article was written by a General, and posted on USNI, I'm inclined to believe the title is intentionally antagonistic. If the title was more neutral, such as explaining that the data is publicly available, and affects more than just US aircraft, it wouldn't be an issue. Something like, "Publicly Available ADS-B Data Reveals Locations of Military Aircraft". Calling out Twitter is not necessary; It's ADS-B's fault, not Twitter.
- drivingmenuts 4y agoIt got your attention, which is more likely the point. A well-known, visible “adversary” was needed and since a lot of the trackers post on Twitter, it’s ready-made for such a thing. If they posted more on Instagram, same thing.