4 ms·

>Let me know what your thoughts Do you have any data showing your service is better/more accurate/better false positive rate than competing offerings? >IPDete

by bragr 4y ago

>Let me know what your thoughts Do you have any data showing your service is better/more accurate/better false positive rate than competing offerings? >IPDetective collects data from about 60+ different sources such as official cloud provider endpoints and public VPN/Proxy/Tor/Bot net lists. Are you on the up and up with all those public sources? I'm not sure which ones you're sourcing, but many do not allow commercial use, resale, or at the very least have some attribution clause to keep security companies from mooching off crowdsourced data. >No, currently IPDetective does not support ipv6 addresses. However this feature is on the road map. That's a major shortcoming in 2022. Finally, as itake pointed out bellow, I'm not giving you my email just to run a simple test query and see what the results look like.

Terretta 4y ago
>> currently IPDetective does not support ipv6 addresses. However this feature is on the road map. > That's a major shortcoming in 2022. In the US, it’d be nice if national ISPs (fiber, cable, and mobile) thought this.
AndrewCopeland 4y ago
Thanks for your input. >Do you have any data showing your service is better/more accurate/better false positive rate than competing offerings I have signed up to some of the competitors and my service averaged about 20ms per request for a single IP address. From the competition it was typically around 200ms to 300ms. Regarding better false positives that would be rather hard to do. > Are you on the up and up with all those public sources? I gathered from sources that did not have any licensing related to non-commercial use. Would you recommend I reach out to all of the sources regardless even if they say you can use it for commercial use? Or do not say anything about commercial use at all? > No, currently IPDetective does not support ipv6 addresses. However this feature is on the road map. Yeah I know, just focusing on IPv4 right now. I am still collecting ipv6 addresses however I have not implemented it in the service yet. Thanks a bunch for writing the comments above.
- kosolam 4y ago
  Yeap… measure the amount of requests for ipv6 support you get from your users, not hn users :-)
  - bragr 4y ago
    https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
    - zamadatix 4y ago
      Wrong kind of user, customer vs end user. Still probably worth pursuing but this more shows the percentage of end users using Google via a mobile phone than anything.

by bragr 4y ago

Terretta 4y ago

>> currently IPDetective does not support ipv6 addresses. However this feature is on the road map. > That's a major shortcoming in 2022. In the US, it’d be nice if national ISPs (fiber, cable, and mobile) thought this.

AndrewCopeland 4y ago

Thanks for your input. >Do you have any data showing your service is better/more accurate/better false positive rate than competing offerings I have signed up to some of the competitors and my service averaged about 20ms per request for a single IP address. From the competition it was typically around 200ms to 300ms. Regarding better false positives that would be rather hard to do. > Are you on the up and up with all those public sources? I gathered from sources that did not have any licensing related to non-commercial use. Would you recommend I reach out to all of the sources regardless even if they say you can use it for commercial use? Or do not say anything about commercial use at all? > No, currently IPDetective does not support ipv6 addresses. However this feature is on the road map. Yeah I know, just focusing on IPv4 right now. I am still collecting ipv6 addresses however I have not implemented it in the service yet. Thanks a bunch for writing the comments above.

kosolam 4y ago
Yeap… measure the amount of requests for ipv6 support you get from your users, not hn users :-)
- bragr 4y ago
  https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
  - zamadatix 4y ago
    Wrong kind of user, customer vs end user. Still probably worth pursuing but this more shows the percentage of end users using Google via a mobile phone than anything.