> The issue was closed for bypassing fingerprinting, a use case that the maintainers feel is not a valid precursor to this feature. Again, that isn’t a no to th

> The issue was closed for bypassing fingerprinting, a use case that the maintainers feel is not a valid precursor to this feature. Again, that isn’t a no to the feature under any circumstance, just a statement that this use case is insufficient. I implore you to open a new issue then, under the guise of your valid use case. I am sure that it will stay open, and that it will not be closed as a duplicate /s