Naming is hard. It requires an understanding of what a thing does (or more accurately, at the time of coming up with the name: what the thing WILL do). One use

Naming is hard. It requires an understanding of what a thing does (or more accurately, at the time of coming up with the name: what the thing WILL do). One useful practice I've acquired over the years is to make the names unique. It makes it easier to search for them later. Generally, I would lean towards descriptive names. If the name no longer fits the thing, that's a great warning about scope issues. If it sounds "weird" for other named things to be dependent on or be required by the named thing -- that's often a hint about a context issue.