4 ms·
Is not a bad discussion to have but the problem we have is that we can engage in an utilitarian/functional debate of option A being more beneficial for society
by sebastianconcpt 4y ago
Is not a bad discussion to have but the problem we have is that we can engage in an utilitarian/functional debate of option A being more beneficial for society than option B. The problem we have is that as much as we can stay in that realm, which is a civilizational realm, there are too many ideologues that pose as they care about "beneficial" things for society but they secretly are engaged in a sort of anti-civilizational religious war where argument doesn't matter: only them gaining more power over you and you just obeying more the rules, taxes and regulations they infinitely vomit. So as much I am not axiomatic, I am pragmatic in not willingly ignore these radicals.
Have you heard about Negative Dialectics?
- lovich 4y agoGonna be honest dude, that paragraph barely made any sense. I think productive conversation is done here
- sebastianconcpt 4y agoThen I have no choice but agree there is a limit right there dude. But take a picture and read it again in 2032 see if it still doesn't "make any sense". The prediction is that it will because the culture war won't stop at your limit of understanding (and I'm not even blaming you for expressing that limit, as not understanding it is the designed behavioral default in our societies). I've enjoyed your honest dialogue attempt. Take care.