> I also consider nuclear retaliation strike to be morally dubious. What's the point? The point isn't that you win something with a second strike. The point i

> I also consider nuclear retaliation strike to be morally dubious. What's the point? The point isn't that you win something with a second strike. The point is that second strike capability ensures no actor can make a first strike without risking consequence. It's about deterrent, not about winning.