The frustrating thing here seems to be the miss of justice. It takes extreme examples before anyone will correct a wrong. The police are cross referencing DNA f

The frustrating thing here seems to be the miss of justice. It takes extreme examples before anyone will correct a wrong. The police are cross referencing DNA from alternative database, 23and me, etc, .. but there is very little protection to stop them. Yes, this is a case where the police are checking the dna collect from a police action (where she's the victim) to a police database of a prior crime. (Less bad than 3rd parties) However, this still brings up the question of rights to privacy and limitations of police through third parties. (Police have been found to use data aggrigators to find and track people without warrants) Not a lawyer but a big question: How do you assert your rights if you don't know if they've been violated. (I.e. you're been investigated due to what a third party has collected) We need privacy protection laws. My understanding is without them you have to be an aggrieved party to protect yourself.