> The trajectory of Lightbend has been raising doubts for a while, some would argue since the renaming. Definitely. I remember some of us Scala early adopters

> The trajectory of Lightbend has been raising doubts for a while, some would argue since the renaming. Definitely. I remember some of us Scala early adopters being concerned about the nonsensical name change, and being assured by others that nothing fundamental was being changed, that Lightbend was "a more user friendly name than TypeSafe" (as if the notion of type-safety was a barrier to entry for goddamn Scala, for crying out loud). Seems we skeptics were proven right.