6 ms·
They are just making them up. At the end of the day there are way to many variables to accurately predict the climate. It's been a lot hotter in the past and a
by collyw 4y ago
They are just making them up. At the end of the day there are way to many variables to accurately predict the climate. It's been a lot hotter in the past and a lot colder. I see no reason for the panic.
- peterashford 4y agoSome of this is extremely basic physics. Like, white ice reflects solar energy and dark ocean absorbs it. If you don't have faith in science to get that right, you really shouldn't use any tech at all for fear it's too complex for humans to understand.
- collyw 4y agoScience can't get a weather forecast accurate for more than a few days. What chance have they got about being right about the climate hysteria on a longer term? Why will a longer term prediction be be more accurate? They have had less chances to go back and amend the models than the short term forecasters. > If you don't have faith in science to get that right That's the fundamental point, it's a faith based argument. I want some real world evidence that these absurd predictions are likely to be accurate. That won't happen as it's all based on "models" that have no history of being accurate.
- peterashford 4y agoThe climate change predictions dating back to the 70s have been remarkably accurate. This has been studied - you are not the first person to ask how accurate these models are.
- collyw 4y agoBollocks. Various major cities were supposed to be underwater by 2000, then 2020. Sea levels have risen a few millimeters at most. Or can you dig out some of the ones you have found to be accurate? Here's one that wasn't: https://nypost.com/2020/01/10/the-telling-tale-of-glacier-national-parks-gone-by-2020-signs/ https://nypost.com/2020/01/10/the-telling-tale-of-glacier-na...