Wikipedia is fine for scientific topics. But for history, living persons, and any potential source other controversial it can be very slanted depending on who h

Wikipedia is fine for scientific topics. But for history, living persons, and any potential source other controversial it can be very slanted depending on who has ownership of the page. It can be interesting to open the talk tab on a page and get a sense of the kind of bias the page owners have. Often there's more content on the talk page than the article itself, one example I have on hand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ada_Lovelace/Archive_1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ada_Lovelace/Archive_1