I didn't downvote you out of spite, but because of the factual errors in your post, notably: > Coding C++, you need only choose known-correct primitives to get

I didn't downvote you out of spite, but because of the factual errors in your post, notably: > Coding C++, you need only choose known-correct primitives to get the same level of assurance. C++ has no such primitives that offer the same level of assurance as Rust does. Not every disagreement is spiteful.