2 ms·
There are far worse places. I think the HN crowd is pretty good at looking and analyzing data (regardless of the source). There are many other places (respect
by jgalt212 4y ago
There are far worse places. I think the HN crowd is pretty good at looking and analyzing data (regardless of the source). There are many other places (respected and non-respected) where the audience takes as gospel whatever the newsreader says (irrespective of whether supporting or muddling data is presented).
- mikeyouse 4y ago> There are far worse places. I can't think of any that profess to be useful. > I think the HN crowd is pretty good at looking and analyzing data Seriously, look through the comments on this article then compare the general antivax tenor to literally anywhere with experts. It frankly reminds me of the 9/11 truther "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" tropes that were repeatedly and patiently proven wrong by engineers, only to have the number of conspiracy theorists grow in number and confidence.