3 ms·
You said above: "The anarchy part is a consequence, not a cause." I suppose you meant "a consequence of economical growth", because the article and other commen
by gbog 15y ago
You said above: "The anarchy part is a consequence, not a cause." I suppose you meant "a consequence of economical growth", because the article and other comment said something similar to "anarchy is the cause for growth" and you seemed to bring a counter point to the discussion.
Then, maybe you can explain why and how anarchy could be a consequence of economic growth.
- yaix 15y agoEconomic growth makes a few rich, and those can do whatever they want, especially in a society with low ethical standards. The executive or judical powers are neutralized with money (a.k.a. corruption).