4 ms·
I'm absolutely not, because that is not in interest of any of the payment provider to make it easier for the user to change for competing, cheaper payment provi
by xani_ 4y ago
I'm absolutely not, because that is not in interest of any of the payment provider to make it easier for the user to change for competing, cheaper payment provider
>The first time you use such an API using a client which would handle all the payment stuff in the background, it would open a payment channel by depositing some amount in a smart contract with a standardized interface, a
and crypto is terrible way to deal with normal money transactions on every level
- 7373737373 4y agoDisagreed, in some instances this could be the easiest way of getting an API monetized. No messing around with a third party service. Clients wouldn't need to register anywhere. Considering the many new machine learning APIs, now might be a good time for this. Crypto does have its problems, irreversible transactions can be a big problem. But with microtransactions, it might not matter that much.