3 ms·
> The fact that the compiler doesn't cover that automatically doesn't mean Go fails at it But that's exactly what OP was talking about. Maybe for you that does
by valenterry 4y ago
> The fact that the compiler doesn't cover that automatically doesn't mean Go fails at it
But that's exactly what OP was talking about. Maybe for you that doesn't mean Go fails here, but for (us) Scala developers it definitely feel like Go fails us. We want a language that fails at compiletime in as many cases as possible.
> But that's not much of a point if it's not a real problem in practice.
Maybe not for you. For me it is!
- cube2222 4y agoI agree it's fine to have different taste, as I mentioned in another reply to you. But it's the difference between whether this statement is objective, or subjective. > is the best concurrency library on any platform
- valenterry 4y agoFair enough, that sentence is a bit over the top. I personally agree, but it is subjective and sounds like a fact.