4 ms·
> The locomotives are made intentionally much heavier than they could be made. The weight of batteries cannot be a problem and any energy used to accelerate a h
by dragontamer 4y ago
> The locomotives are made intentionally much heavier than they could be made. The weight of batteries cannot be a problem and any energy used to accelerate a higher mass is recovered.
Hydrogen storage technology can fit 30MW-hrs of electricity in a standard semi-truck today (aka: 900kg of pressurized H2), and liquid-hydrogen cryogenics are coming around that fits far, far more energy in much denser packages.
How many Li-ion batteries do you need to store 30MW-hrs?
1/10th of this won't fit on a train ya know: https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-megapacks-300mw-victoria-battery-video/ https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-megapacks-300mw-victoria-bat...
- adrian_b 4y agoYou are right about the lower energy density of batteries, but in the same space where you can store 30 MWh of hydrogen you can store much more energy as diesel fuel. So that is not an argument in favor of using hydrogen, that is an argument in favor of using the traditional diesel-electric locomotives.
- dragontamer 4y ago1. Green H2 production needs to happen so that we get our fertilizers off of fossil fuels. The "greenification" of H2 / Ammonia / Fertilizer is one of the most important tasks of the near future, regardless of the energy / fuel issue. 2. Once we've stockpiled large amounts of H2, and created H2 pipelines to support the Fertilizer industry, we will gain the opportunity to use that H2 as transportation as well. 3. H2 to Syngas to Kerosene (or other hydrocarbons) are additional hits to efficiency. Electricity to H2 to electricity is some 40% efficient. But electricity to H2 to Syngas to Kerosene to ICE engine is like 1% efficient at best. Maybe in the future, the H2 + CO2 Syngas -> Hydrocarbon chemistries can be made more efficient? But its not looking good for modern technology. ------- "Green" energy is going to be harder than just slurping up pre-made hydrocarbons in the ground. But we've got like, climate-change issues, pollution, and other such issues we're trying to deal with? Diesel does work, and trains are rather efficient. But still, they're a good use case (large enough for H2 tanks), that H2 is likely a good fit. Might as well cut out the carbon emissions where it is easiest. It probably will be easier to convert trains to H2 Fuel cells rather than Cars to EV / Li-ion.