4 ms·

thanks! :D

• cygx 4y ago
  While we're at it, it's "analysis", not "analisys"...
  • nilsb 4y ago
    Also, there's "different" vs. "diferent" in the examples: source:2:2: error: _Static_assert failed "types are diferent" 2 |static_assert(typeid(a) == typeid(double [10]), "types are diferent"); |^
    • golem14 4y ago
      Wow, the jackals are out in full force tonight ;) Seth Meyers must have been offline for a while ?
• rch 4y ago
  Typo in the title as well - although I like the idea that a programmer in the future will search for a contemporary feature called a 'compiler frond' and happen upon this discussion.
  • thradams 4y ago
    Wow this is really bad! This was my first topic here in hacker news. I wasn't expecting all this traffic. Good to see and find more people interested in this kind of project. I will be more careful in the future.
    • bee_rider 4y ago
      Eh, users here just like to find things to complain about. If you didn't have some little typos, the thread would just be bikesheding. And, too much care and you'll never share. It is a hobby project anyway, it doesn't need to be perfect, and it was good to share either way. People are clearly interested!
      • rch 4y ago
        Agreed!
    • gus_massa 4y ago
      > Wow this is really bad! People making comment, even about typos means that people find the project interesting enough to read it and try to write a helpful comment. This is a great first topic in HN.