2 ms·
I don't like them - they were OK when talking about 6-8 chips in 3-4 generations. But after the 30th different lake you get thoroughly confused. Apple did it be
by MagnumOpus 4y ago
I don't like them - they were OK when talking about 6-8 chips in 3-4 generations. But after the 30th different lake you get thoroughly confused. Apple did it better, switching from big cats to big cliffs after ten releases...
- Hnrobert42 4y agoIMO, they would be even better if they would be even better if they were in alphabetical order. Would make it easier to remember which came first.
- PurpleRamen 4y agoThe names are all random and without obvious connection to the product, so does it real matter? The confusion comes from the amount, not the naming. So in this case, calling it an overused naming-scheme might be the better description.
- speed_spread 4y agoGoing from cool felines to places you fall from or wreck your ship into is an interesting analogy for OS X evolution.