3 ms·
I think it’s a fair critique; at the very least MacOS should more readily expose this information to power users and sysads who want to know. I don’t think it
by Tsiklon 4y ago
I think it’s a fair critique; at the very least MacOS should more readily expose this information to power users and sysads who want to know.
I don’t think it should be necessary to rely on third party software to review the status of an important first party system component.
- hericium 4y agoOSX was an operating system for both power users and common users. macOS is just for the latter. Power users require hardware and software they can trust and rely on and macOS is an unreliable garbage which breaks UX under the disguise of security updates. Ivy and Cook made me switch from their computer products to whatever I can run FreeBSD or Linux on. It's almost like Cook is waiting for security flaws discoveries to push UI changes, take configuration options away or introduce another privacy-invading snooping mechanisms under the disgraceful pretense of protecting children.