> Where was this fella when we needed him in parliament? There's no obligation to protest everything you disagree with, why would you suggest there is? Further

> Where was this fella when we needed him in parliament? There's no obligation to protest everything you disagree with, why would you suggest there is? Furthermore, how do you know they _didnt_ protest the PM? The PM may not have been voted for, but a crucial difference is, unlike the monarchy, the position of PM is not handed down by hereditary lineage. > including the agenda to reduce freedom to protest and other basic rights of the people. Don't you think perhaps these two events are related? You chastise someone for protesting, whilst bemoaning the right for protest being eroded. A strange contradiction.