4 ms·
I mean what I now is that I've got a brand new benchmark for video card upgrades: next time I'm shopping "VRAM to get 1024x1024 resolution of Stable Diffusion"
by XorNot 4y ago
I mean what I now is that I've got a brand new benchmark for video card upgrades: next time I'm shopping "VRAM to get 1024x1024 resolution of Stable Diffusion" is a dominating factor.
All the current work is a shot across the bow that technology, libraries and research are orbiting some pretty serious utilities.
What does remain to be seen is whether we're in the exponential part of the S-curve or at the top for this particular set of models. But I suspect we'll see the space pretty thoroughly explored in the next 12 months - no large tech company will be taken seriously if it doesn't have a competent image generation model in the wild.
- nl 4y agoStable Diffusion has been trained at 512x512 and doesn't work very well above this. But upscalers are ok and can even run on CPUs.
- trention 4y ago>no large tech company will be taken seriously if it doesn't have a competent image generation model in the wild Wow, what a lot of bull. Defining a large tech company as 10k+ employees, I can assure you 90% of those won't ever touch image generation. Why would a company like SAP even consider this crap?
- bambax 4y agoIf a competitor does it, so will SAP. For instance, if Salesforce can generate meaningful thumbnails for leads or campaigns, etc., then SAP would have to match that.
- trention 4y agoAssuming this is even a feature users want (they probably don't; why would you have your ERP generate those instead of specialized software?), it makes 0 sense for SAP to build their own model instead of using an open-source one.