4 ms·
Yes, but HFCS is cheaper. Cheaper means it ends up in more products. Cheaper means more gets consumed. I mentioned in another comment above that circa 2003-ish
by chiefalchemist 4y ago
Yes, but HFCS is cheaper. Cheaper means it ends up in more products. Cheaper means more gets consumed.
I mentioned in another comment above that circa 2003-ish the NYT Sunday mag ran an opinion piece that proposed that gov subsidies of corn were contributing to the obesity crisis. Lower corn prices === lower price for HFCS === more HFCS in more products === more products at lower prices === more sweetener calories being consumed.
Our gut microbes aren't evolved for this type of diet.
- jjallen 4y agoSugar is negligibly expensive. It's just so cheap. In a wealthy region such as W. Europe, I can't even see the price differential mattering.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoWhen you're manufacturing at scale pennies add up. If not, then how else do we explain the rise in the use of HFCS?