> but they become violently confrontational if you say it might be addictive for some Going out on a limb here but it might be in the same spirit as a similar

> but they become violently confrontational if you say it might be addictive for some Going out on a limb here but it might be in the same spirit as a similar response to "Strong encryption is for child abuse and terrorism" / "Bittorrent is for pirating movies" in that it's true in some cases but is used as a popular discourse wedge to promote governmental overreach