> The parent would agree that Roger Ebert is notable. But s/he is arguing that legendary should have a higher bar. I think that's a reasonable view, but that's

> The parent would agree that Roger Ebert is notable. But s/he is arguing that legendary should have a higher bar. I think that's a reasonable view, but that's not what I took issue with. I take issue with the claim that critics produce nothing and have nothing in the line. And with the notion that legendary stature would be impossible for a critic to attain.