10 ms·
>We have seen world wide that schools are THE most effective tool for lifting people out of poverty. We also see that the countries with the best schools are do
by thrown_22 4y ago
>We have seen world wide that schools are THE most effective tool for lifting people out of poverty. We also see that the countries with the best schools are dominating the world economy.
What does this even mean? The US spends more an education than anyone else and it dominated the world's economy because it's blown up everyone else who tried. This is a tautology. The countries with the schools people who rank schools like best are ranked best. That doesn't mean they are actually best.
Schooling absolutely helps people get out of poverty. But that doesn't mean it's the type of school that dominant in the West. We have a school and university system that's extended day care and teaches both incredibly slowly and way too fast. With smaller classes we could reduce the 12 years of schooling the average child gets today to 4. We never will because the parents don't know what to do with them and there aren't any jobs for 12 year olds.
- Test0129 4y agoI would like to see the numbers. I want to believe schooling really "changes lives" like the universities selling student loans want you to believe (I myself being a victim of this). However, I have a sneaking suspicion that if we took a cohort of high school students who weren't particularly interested in so-called hard learning and taught them valuable trade work it would have a similar effect. Sure, you can wrap trades in education to make your point, but I think GPs point was that formal beyond high school education is what lifts people out of poverty.