3 ms·
Well, let's baseline with Zig. Because that adds build dependency management. Building code has got to work like GO: it needs to be built into the compiler. Let
by scrubs 4y ago
Well, let's baseline with Zig. Because that adds build dependency management. Building code has got to work like GO: it needs to be built into the compiler. Let's also add formal methods that's bound up with the implementation language even if it starts 1-way from FM to code. Correctness in any of its several dimensions would be better with pragmatic FM together with the code itself.
Zig, which deals with C/C++ code, has the ultimately eco-system. That's a big plus.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- benj111 4y agoAs a non professional programmer the thing that i don't like about zig is it tries to make you do the right thing. I like playing around with the side effects of things, abusing pointers etc. It isn't safe, it isn't sensible but I'm not aiming to do safe sensible things.