4 ms·
The argument made by the plantiffs is that they were harmed by the Treasury Dept's action. One of the plantiffs deposited funds into Tornado for personal privac
by chizhik-pyzhik 4y ago
The argument made by the plantiffs is that they were harmed by the Treasury Dept's action. One of the plantiffs deposited funds into Tornado for personal privacy, and now cannot legally access these funds.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1188185/gov.uscourts.txwd.1188185.1.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.11...
- null0pointer 4y agoIs it possible the court will just say "Plaintiffs get a one-time opportunity to declare the source of and withdraw their funds from the contract"? I don't know if this is the sort of thing a court can do but it seems like the obvious solution to eliminate the damages to the plaintiffs while keeping the sanction in place.
- intrasight 4y agoThat would be a good outcome