3 ms·
The concept of “jaywalking,” for example, is integral to the “car technology” of today. The crime of crossing a street without respecting the dominance of cars
by mgraczyk 4y ago
The concept of “jaywalking,” for example, is integral to the “car technology” of today. The crime of crossing a street without respecting the dominance of cars was invented by the car industry in the 1920s, who pushed hard to define streets as a place for cars, not people.
This story has been repeated in a lot of articles lately, but it doesn't seem to be true. If you read the linked article included as "evidence", it establishes that cities themselves started pushing for "jaywalking" as a concept. I haven't seen any evidence that the "car industry" played any role, even passively, in making "jaywalking" a concept.
As for the rest of the article, yes we should be biking more. I don't have a car and I bike for ~98% of my trips. When it rains, I want there to be an option to ride in a covered vehicle. Until by some miracle we build 10x more trains, I will be taking a car. Better it be self-driving and safe + electric than human-driven + gas.
- bombcar 4y agoIt's also really obvious and definitely would be a side-effect of cars becoming more popular. Nobody considers the "anti-jaywalking" laws around crossing railroad tracks to be an issue, and everyone recognizes that a train will flatten a pedestrian without a problem. People really like a conspiracy because it explains why things aren't "good now" without having to actually wrestle with the causes and reasons why things may be the way they are.