I think things will categorically change about how we define art in the next little while. We may see an increase of parasocial-style livestream art drawing, so

I think things will categorically change about how we define art in the next little while. We may see an increase of parasocial-style livestream art drawing, so the illustrator isn't just an illustrator but specifically a personality attached (an exaggeration of the current artist-art relationship commonly known today). We may also determine AI-generated art is simply in another category, like photography, CGI, digital, and traditional portraits are all considered different categories. I can imagine human-generated novels and AI-generated novels are neatly separated, with associated scandals if a human attempts to pass an AI-generated novel as their own creation (scandals already currently exists for humans who eg. a romance writer recently got in trouble for lifting paragraphs from fanfic they didn't write into their original fiction). There's nothing to say that creativity will die. We invented typewriters, but calligraphy is still an art whose pens and inks are beloved interests. We invented the digital screen and the paper machines, but handmade paper and hand-stitched book binding is still an artist's pursuit.