3 ms·
But then I think you are giving up the main advantage of using mechanical turk over just roughly matching pixels. It is possible matching pixels will get the wr
by jethroalias97 15y ago
But then I think you are giving up the main advantage of using mechanical turk over just roughly matching pixels. It is possible matching pixels will get the wrong answer where a human, with the context of being human, will know what the image is supposed to be and get the write answer, captcha style.
Example: an iron fence with a scenic view behind and where the slices are too small for someone to match only two.
- jarin 15y agoSpeaking of CAPTCHAs, a smaller version of this would make an excellent one. Er, well maybe not, given the ease of programmatic solutions.
- thesis 15y agoThis would be beat with a very high success rate if it were a captcha.
- jarin 15y agoWhat about doing the same thing, but fuzzing a few pixels from each edge to avoid pixel distance matching? You could even make the edges just plain black for a few pixels from each edge. The human eye would be able to complete the image (it would just look like it has black bars), but I'm guessing it would be enough to prevent a simple algorithmic solution. Edit: This is essentially the same idea as the iron fence posted above.