4 ms·
Newgrounds: "not have the Art Portal flooded with computer-generated art" DeviantArt: "complaining that their feeds are getting flooded" Artstation: "the fron
by advisedwang 4y ago
Newgrounds: "not have the Art Portal flooded with computer-generated art"
DeviantArt: "complaining that their feeds are getting flooded"
Artstation: "the front pages are flooded with unmodified AI generated slop"
They're really worried about the volume that AI art scales. So they don't really have to chase down every image and decide if it's AI or not. They just need to stop users from throwing huge amounts of them, which is easy to detect.
- nonbirithm 4y agoI contrast these reasons with the FurAffinity announcement from a week ago[0]: > AI art is a damn good learning tool, but it's taking everything it does from artists. It leeches on the time, effort, skill, energy an artist put into their work. > You can use tools like this to learn and try to come up with concepts to learn from. I have nothing wrong with that, but just adding it to an image gallery. The origin are questionable unlike, say, using a site specifically for royalty free images. > I stand with artists, not prompts. [0] https://twitter.com/Dragoneer/status/1566900442650628096 https://twitter.com/Dragoneer/status/1566900442650628096