Your comment completely ignores the content of the article you are commenting upon. You concentrate on the "normal" nutrition stuff like fat, fiber and carbohy

Your comment completely ignores the content of the article you are commenting upon. You concentrate on the "normal" nutrition stuff like fat, fiber and carbohydrates, without even asking why do people eat more than 100 years ago. The article talks about the fact that food now contains a lot of totally unnatural chemical substances that our ancestors never encountered and that such substances may throw off our sense of satiety and disrupt other mechanisms directly related to obesity. That is a serious problem. An apple or a piece of meat laced with various chemicals isn't the same as 100 years ago. It seems you choose to ignore this difference.