3 ms·

I was more thinking of more populated countries like the UK, but it's still a large part of the countryside. >> That's before we include offshore wind, solar,

I was more thinking of more populated countries like the UK, but it's still a large part of the countryside. >> That's before we include offshore wind, solar, geothermal, nuclear, hydro, and storage... Basically, you're spreading FUD. Yeah, one of those is not like the other. Not sure how you slip nuclear in there given that Greens are against it. Storage isn't a solved problem either.

nicoburns 4y ago
> I was more thinking of more populated countries like the UK The UK is solving that problem by putting most of the turbines in the sea. Seems to be working well so far.
- gadders 4y ago
  Clearly not as energy prices have gone up due to a shortage of supply.
  - nicoburns 4y ago
    The amount of supply depends on amount of wind turbines built, not the amount we have space for. We have space for a lot more than we've built so far.
viraptor 4y ago
They may be against it. They also have a very minor representation in the uk gov, so not that relevant. Storage is practically non-issue. We can dump the waste underground for thousands of years with almost no planning. (still a more healthy solution than what we do with other fuel now) The volume required is basically not worth talking about.
- gadders 4y ago
  For storage I was talking about holding electricity generated by renewables, not parking nuclear waste.