4 ms·
It's EU law, which by definition makes it 'transnational' law. There's nothing which requires the EU to impose that law, but it is law nevertheless.
by d1sxeyes 4y ago
It's EU law, which by definition makes it 'transnational' law.
There's nothing which requires the EU to impose that law, but it is law nevertheless.
- adolph 4y agoI apologize if my comment was pedantic as we don't disagree. The parent quote is "If you are not a member of a certain country or economic zone, you cannot get and keep that zone's exclusive domains. Thats law." While the context is the EU, the parent made a claim larger than the EU, which is not correct. It would be different if the parent had written "If you are not a member of the EU. . ." but that was not what was written. Likewise, an EU law that governs only EU assets isn't transnational. For example, Poland doesn't have eligibility criteria [0] but French ccTLDs like .pm do [1]. As I read the restriction text I detect a touch of the spite referred to elsewhere as it has exceptions for other non-EU-member European countries: "Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein" 0. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/cctld/pl/index.html https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/cctld/pl/index.html 1. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/cctld/pm/index.html https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/cctld/pm/index.html
- d1sxeyes 4y agoThose are the single market countries, it’s not unusual to see those four as exceptions, but I take your point, OP could have been more precise.