3 ms·
>If you try to "take the lane" you are essentially positioning yourself in a way that tries to police other drivers behaviour, or block them. If a driver gets
by Swenrekcah 4y ago
>If you try to "take the lane" you are essentially positioning yourself in a way that tries to police other drivers behaviour, or block them.
If a driver gets so annoyed at another road user that they'll honk at them or become agressive, then the driver is by this definiton trying to police the other's behaviour.
But really this should not be a battle between 'drivers' and 'cyclists'. Most people can be both, and certainly most cyclists are also at least occasionally drivers.
When a cyclist 'takes the lane' they are trying to signal to the drivers behind them that a narrow pass is unsafe, if they need to pass then they need to wait for a clear road from the opposite lane, just as if the cycle was a large slow motor vehicle. Except the cycle gives the passing driver excellent visibility and an easy pass.
Another reason can be if the cyclist has an upcoming left turn, they obviously need to position themselves towards the left of the lane (s/left/right/[UK,AUS,NZ,IN,etc]).
- veltas 4y agoI'm not justifying it, just explaining why people are getting angry. These people are likely all sociopaths, but nevertheless this is why.
- Swenrekcah 4y agoOk, but then the more appropriate recommendation would be a periodic pshycological evaluation for drivers, not to tell vulnerable road users to stay away.