3 ms·
Yeah at this point it appears to be a cultural issue. There’s been plenty of opportunity to anoint a proper package manager that doesn’t require virtual environ
by hardwaregeek 4y ago
Yeah at this point it appears to be a cultural issue. There’s been plenty of opportunity to anoint a proper package manager that doesn’t require virtual environments or install things globally by default, that uses lock files and resolves dependencies without too much fuss. If I’m not mistaken poetry and pipenv offer this. But there just isn’t the buy in. People in the Python world, including many in this thread, just seem to refuse this path and insist, proudly, that their workflow is just fine. It’s a kind of psychological curiosity that people would resist proper package management so fervently.
- PaulHoule 4y agoThe average data scientist thinks it is OK to have a manual process to make the monthly report so long as it takes less than 1 month and so does their manager. And so does the VC that funds it. I mean, you can’t write a command line program which is reliable and straightforward to install in blub, why would anybody need it?