5 ms·
ULID in particular is fine -- as it is compatible with UUID (it can relatively easily be converted to something that looks like a UUID), but others are not (ex.
by hardwaresofton 4y ago
ULID in particular is fine -- as it is compatible with UUID (it can relatively easily be converted to something that looks like a UUID), but others are not (ex. nanoid which is variable).
I wanted the extension to be consistent in what it outputs for the default function scheme (idkit_<something>_generate). Arguably `idkit_<something_generate_text` is more explicit and thus clearer but generate and generate_uuid aren't terrible either.