Yes. RMS was highly critical of APSL 1.0 http://www.linuxtoday.com/mailprint.php3?action=pv&ltsn=1999-03-22-001-05-NW-LF http://www.linuxtoday.com/mailprint.ph

Yes. RMS was highly critical of APSL 1.0 http://www.linuxtoday.com/mailprint.php3?action=pv&ltsn=1999-03-22-001-05-NW-LF http://www.linuxtoday.com/mailprint.php3?action=pv&ltsn=... So Apple revised the APSL to address some of his concerns.